Talk:2006 Zambian general election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Africa: Zambia Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Zambia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Zambia.

Untitled

This article reads like a research paper, not an encyclopedia entry. Major work and wikification needs to be done.--Thomas.macmillan 22:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zambian presidential election, 2006 should be merged here; there's no reason for separate articles. Everyking 06:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree they should be merged, but the article Zambian parliamentary election, 2006 redirects here and that needs an entry of its own. (Am86 02:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

There should be two articles, one on presidential and one on parliamentary elections, with this present article as an disambig article. Electionworld Talk? 10:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I restored Zambian parliamentary election, 2006. (Am86 20:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Inconsistent results

Results for the National Assembly elections from various sources are inconsistent. This even applies to the ECZ, who state that the ULP won two seats in their seat total document, but in the constituency results it can be seen that the ULP in fact won three seats (Livingstone, Lukulu East and Lukulu West).

I have compiled the results table from the constituency data, which also contains one inconsistency – the number of valid votes cast. This is because they have incorrectly totalled the results for Nakonde, omitting the 11,935 votes cast for the MMD candidate. Also note that I have included the vote figures for the UPND and the FDD in the UDA totals, as the parties were part of that alliance (the one candidate listed as UPND won a seat). Number 5 7 14:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3 candidates for President?

--BonsMans1•talk, 10:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BonsMans1: What do you mean? Number 5 7 11:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hakainde Hichilema also participated. --BonsMans1•talk, 12:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BonsMans1: There were five candidates for the presidential election. Could you explain what the purpose of your comment was. Cheers, Number 5 7 13:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox shows 2 of them? --BonsMans1•talk, 14:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BonsMans1: You could WP:BEBOLD and add it yourself – I've done it now. We have a general rule that only candidates with over 5% of votes should be in the infobox (plus second place candidates with less than 5% of the vote). Cheers, Number 5 7 14:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

The results published in this source (2006) are quite different from those published in this new source (2021) (click on "2006 tripartite election", then on "view results", to see all costituencies).

Constituency	Party	Source 2006	Source 2021	Difference
074 Rufunsa	UDA	1,497	5,120	+3,623
064 Mwense	UDA	780	1,360	+580
012 Chitambo	UDA	282	1,369	+1,087
021 Kwacha	UDA	2,425	2,425	0
021 Kwacha	RP	3,220	2,425	-795

As a consequence:

for UDA: 610,608 + 5,290 = 615,898;
for RP: 7,349 - 795 = 6,554;
valid votes: 2,713,165 + 4,495 = 2,717,660.

The new source includes two constituencies in which elections were postponed; including them, results change and valid votes are 2,740,624 (= 2,717,660 + 11,894 Lupososhi + 11,070 Kabompo East). --151 cp (talk) 19:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the figures in the 'new' source are wrong, and a result of user input error – possibly as the results were put into the new system manually or via a lookup system with some errors.

For Rufunsa I think the new figure for the UDA vote is that for Chongwe (which is the constituency above Rufunsa in the original results table), so I suspect it may be an input error by whoever created the new tables. If the new figures are correct, then voter turnout in the constituency was 95%, which seems unlikely.
For Mwense, the same thing appears to have happened; the UDA figure is the same as for Mambilima, the constituency listed above it in the original results.
For Chitambo, the UDA figure is the same as for Muchinga, the constituency listed below Chitambo in the original results.
For Kwacha, the RP figure is identical to the UDA figure, which while not impossible, seems unlikely and looks again like a user input error.

Regarding the two vacant seats, we don't usually add in figures from delayed elections. However, we could note the final results in the prose in the National Assembly section. Cheers, Number 5 7 20:41, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Right observations, I agree with you; regarding 2011 general election, the "new" source shows different datas in nine costituencies (Kabushi, Kanyama, Katombola, Mandevu, Mkaika, Mazabuka Central, Nalolo, Nchelenge and Solwezi Central), but this discrepancy could be caused by the same reason. About delayed elections, 2021 election summary includes votes of Kaumbwe constituency (in which elections were held on 21 October); regarding 2006 election, however, this source shows a different number of votes for Kabompo East constituency, and knowing the "official result" seems difficult. --151 cp (talk) 18:14, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]